Re: Topic of board-discuss list (was: [tdf-discuss] Re: Rules of Procedure approved for TDF board of directors)
Thorsten Behrens wrote
terribly sorry if we ever gave that impression. Admittedly, the
entry on http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/ was worded
like that ("Public discussions of the Board of Directors"), but I'm
rather certain it should read "List for focused interaction of the
public with the Board of Directors" instead. Page changed
accordingly, board-discuss in Cc: in case there's disagreement. ;)
I'm not sure that is the idea. Otherwise you would not get the following
message when you try to post to that list on Nabble
" Authorized Users Only
Only authorized users can proceed in this area. You can use the form below
to send a request to the administrators.
Explain to the administrator(s) why you want to access this restricted area.
I particularly like the part "Explain why"
So I guess it was not meant for "interaction of the public". Maybe
"interaction of the members" at best...
View this message in context:
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy