Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Pedro,

I slightly reorder your mail -

you wrote:
Exactly. That is something the BoD has to decide. After all the
quality of LibreOffice should be the BoD's main concern IMO...

Quality surely should be a concern to all of us. But I disagree that
it should be _the_ overall main concern (if that's what you said) -
there are definitely other equally important aspects, such as
features, interoperability, usability, code quality, growing the
community etc etc.

[download page]

No. There is no wording that can change the fact that TDF is
recommending version 3.6.1 If it wasn't the Large Buttons should
be pointing to version 3.5.6 (and soon to version 3.5.7)

I see what you mean. It is though highly demotivating for developers
to have their nice new version with all those nifty features hidden.

So this will need UX input and some hacking at the download page
code, possibly something resembling the old page, still used here: - but nicer?

Would you be willing to get this ball rolling?


-- Thorsten

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.