Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
Am 14.08.2012 19:13, schrieb Christian Lohmaier:
The whole point in not messing with the reply-to header is that
the message goes to everyone in the message thread.
This is what the developers want!
They don't want to have to be subscribed (since they already
receive enough mail to deal with). They want to be able to send a
request for feedback to the list and receive the replies without
the need to subscribe first or to check mail-archives.
Does this really make sense? The sender of the request would only
receive those mails, that are a direct response to his question.
But, if one sends a request to a mailing list, this usually
initiates a thread of answers and answers to answers and answers to
answers to answers... Mostly, the whole thread contains important
feedback for the initial poster. So, if someone really wants
feedback from a mailing list, he must subscribe or at least watch
LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir!
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Reply settings on this list have changed · Friedrich Strohmaier
Re: [tdf-discuss] Reply settings on this list have changed · Tanstaafl
[tdf-discuss] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed · Marc Paré
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy