Hello Jesús,
Jesús Corrius wrote on 2012-02-03 10:54:
I don't think the joking votes are that important in this particular case.
We have two very serious proposals and I am sure we'll have a great
LibOCon 2012 wherever we hold it. The two places are not that distant
so I don't think it makes a lot of difference one place or the other
one from a practical point of view (I am sure the travel costs are
similar if you don't live in any of the countries). So even if people
who don't plan to attend start voting massively for one of the places,
where's the problem?
I am open for discussion, of course, but I wonder that you seem to have
a different opinion now, since the BoD has voted on this during the last
call. ;-)
So, the point was that we want to avoid to have many people voting who
will not join, but rather have those making the decision who want to
join. I recall back from my OOo days the problems we had with getting
numbers, and in this case, we even had some accounts we could verify,
due to the web site logon. At least I do not feel comfortable with
having some bot from $country voting instead of the community - and it's
technically not that easy to avoid that. Just look at the bot problems
in the wiki, they even manage captchas and mail confirmations.
My proposal was to send out the invitation to subscribers of some
mailing lists, but this is also problematic, since then we would also
exclude other people who make valid contributions and who we simply
could not track.
I am happy to hear others thoughts on that, but for the future, I'd ask
everyone to jump in the time the discussion is being opened, and not one
week later. This introduces delays and much more work. We have open BoD
calls and we have open discussions, so we can decide in time - and not
reopen discussions over and over again.
Thanks,
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger <floeff@documentfoundation.org>
Chairman of the Board at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] LibOCon proposals (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.