Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index



Cor Nouws wrote

Do I remember well that we have/had the idea to choose the organisers 
one year before? As to give them the opportunity to learn from the 
current years organisers experience.. (Not that I think, looking at the 
proposals, that experience is really lacking ;-) )

Could these bids open the possibility to do that right now ?
Would of course have as consequence that one of the teams would need to 
'conserve' their enthusiasm and commitment for another year ...


I couldn't agree more :)

Actually I think it would make a LOT more sense if applications for 2013
were opened AFTER the 2012 LibOCon ends.

Maybe more people from different countries who go to the 2012 meeting see
that it's not so hard after all  and might submit their proposals. I think
it's a good idea to promote diversity and interest in this project?

(Or maybe it is hard and that is why TDF wants people committed for 2013
before it happens? :) )

Just a thought ;)

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibOCon-proposals-tp3696578p3703780.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.