Sincerely,
I am not qualified in any of these areas. But I see the discussion as
almost irrelevant. Imagine us ridding IT terminology of terms referring
to "dated" subjects such as kernel, batch, shell, etc. It is impossible
for us to work with the abstract without referring to the concrete.
Then there is also the symbological meanings behind things such as
hourglass, the analog clock, etc. that will never stop being symbols of
time.
In my opinion, a floppy disk should remain right where it is so that we
can have a heritage reference for us and our future generations.
Just my opinion. Please note that I am not a specialist, so I really
think Mr. Pitonyak´s observation should be considered.
timotheonb
Em 13-01-2012 19:51, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak escreveu:
I have seen a bunch of discussion related to "get rid of Floppy Disk
because it is antiquated", but I am unclear on the qualifications of the
people making the decisions. Is this just a random opinion one way or
another, or are the participants somehow qualified or familiar with
human factors, GUI Design, and similar?
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.