Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 08/11/2011 Cor Nouws wrote:
For some time, I could personally live quite well with a forum that is
clearly, visibly, independent serving LibreOffice and other suites.
Since suggestions made in that direction seem to be more political than
technical feasible, I can leave that illusion.

Does this refer to my answers? If it does, then it seems I failed to convey the message: I've always written that the technical execution would have been so easy to be negligible in discussions. So the technical feasibility had never been questioned: it would have been trivial to implement it (read: it takes less than one hour to do it).

The main problem would thus have been "political", i.e., getting people agree on it.

Of course this is only meant as a clarification in case my messages were not clear enough; I don't want to reopen this discussion.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.