Hi Bob,
I'm an OpenSuSE user too, since long time ago (2005).
I used to install OOo (already Go-OO based), in the past, and Libò, in
more recent time, from the OBS (OpenSuSE Build Service) repositories,
but since some months ago I (definitively?) choose the vanilla one for
your exact same reasons.
In the past, moreover, the OBS packaging yield some newer bugs that
vanilla hasn't. So I choose to abandon OBS (only for that).
I also think that SuSE people time may be better used to improve Libò,
as SuSE is a main TDF contributor.
These events may point out one more thought: if there were a common
linux repositories (and packages too) format TDF (as well as others) may
publishes linux builds only in that manner and distro's package manager
simply link with them... to install and simply update... A dream... ;-)
Have a nice afternoon,
Carlo
Il 31/08/2011 22:42, Robert Boehm ha scritto:
Hi Folks....just wanted to mention on this list....and maybe see if
there is any feedback
(no problem if none)......
I run openSUSE (currently openSUSE 11.4 on my production machines) and
had added the
LibreOffice repository (STABLE) and have been working with that
without problems.
I am fairly conservative, but also kind of like the latest stuff too
as long as proven stable enough
for use. Mind you, I also test the beta versions of everything on a
test machine both in Windows
and in Linux so I see what's coming down the pike and to file bug
reports.
Seems as if the openSUSE maintainer of the LibreOffice stable
repository wants to be more
conservative than me....they are still pushing version 3.3.3 (after
3.3.4 has been out for a while)
and currently in UNSTABLE are still testing 3.4.2 (3.4.3 came out
today)....I decided to push
ahead and go "vanilla" in my Linux machines.....so I uninstalled the
repository versions of 3.3.3
and installed vanilla (from The Document Foundation) version 3.4.3
today. It is running wonderfully
and I am thinking of just going with vanilla versions from now on
(stable branch) instead of the
repository. Oh...yeah...there are a few integration issues with SUSE
like some polish in the look
in KDE, linking up the clipart library is automatic in the repository
version (but easy to do manually
after installation of the vanilla version) and maybe something that
I'm not thinking about.....
But what I wanted to say is this: I am totally excited about this
project and glad that it is flourishing,
and am also happy to be using the latest stable version, as I can see
it's already quicker...imports
formats better....and even though all software has many bugs, this
stuff is wonderful and very usable....
Thank-you for this wonderful project (as the OpenOffice project
continues to stagnate over at the Apache
Foundation for the time being).
I just fixed a friend's computer that wouldn't boot up (a hardware
issue, resolved) and replaced OpenOffice
with LibreOffice 3.4.3 (good timing...came out today!) and he is happy
as can be.
I just solicit one thing: Am I missing anything (other than I
mentioned above) by using the vanilla versions
in Linux rather than being patient and waiting for the openSUSE
repository versions? If the maintainer
of that repository subscribes to this list, I would be happy to listen
to what is said.
Thanks for the patience in this long e-mail...
Bob Boehm
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.