Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 21/07/2011 14:23, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I am of the opinion that good inter-operability with MSO products makes it easier to attract new users and that poor inter-operability with MSO products makes it more difficult.

I quite agree. As (I would say) between 90 and 95% of the business world uses MSO, there's no incentive to change from MSO if the alternatives aren't 100% compatible in terms of formatting, other than cost of upgrading and the activities of the BSA and its' companions. My wife sends me documents written in Office 2003 which sometimes are so badly mangled when I open them in OO or LO that I have to open them in MSO to see what they should look like. And these are in general not complicated documents....Having said that, then there have also been instances of formatting incompatibilities between different versions of MSO....

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.