Hello.
I also think all office applications should use a common codebase for
reading and writing the files, instead competing on one that supports
certain file formats better than the rest. Think of it as something
similar to FFMPeg/Libav, that could be used by all FOSS Office or
reader applications. It can give a enormous support advantage over
Microsoft products and at the same time improve the support with more
developers involved.
I think statements like this in the FOSS world are EXTREMELY SAD:
"With this snapshot Calligra Office Words is claiming better
compatibility with .docx than LibreOffice, and also claims to be
approaching the best compatibility with legacy .doc formats." (taken
from OSNews).
Of course this is a personal idea I gave many months ago in some email
here, but my lack of proper English and not explaining it correctly
made it to be ignored.
Regards.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [tdf-discuss] What about a common document support codebase/library between different FOSS Office suites and readers? · timofonic timofonic
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.