Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 19/06/2011 11:34, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:

Over at Apache, we found compliance quick and easy [1][2][3]

I'm not sure compliance for LibO is as simple and straightforward as you

For starters, code, amongst other things, that is either from, or
benefits users in North Korea, Cuba, and Syria was been submitted to
OOo. At one point, it was included in the nightly developer
patch.(Artefacts of that code are present in OOo 3.3.)

Ideally, TDF has a lawyer in the US that specializes in OFAC, EAR, ITAR,
and related critters, and their intersection with software development
and distribution.

Other countries do have similar lists, with similar restrictions. In an
ideal world, TDF can find a lawyer that specializes in the country's
equivalent critters and the rules that they fabricate, and how those
rules intersects with software development and distribution.

Which means lawyers in all 192/193/194/195/196/203/248/255/320 countries
in the world would need to be contacted. (If you have a question about
the number of countries I list, start a new thread, without derailing
this thread.)


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.