Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-06-06 02.28:
Because Oracle and TDF, in confidential negotiations, could not come to
an agreement.  And I think that's all that need be said on the matter.

well, I guess it has been mentioned on this list before, but let me state it this way:

What TDF would have appreciated since its announcement, even what the wider community would have appreciated to have been given by Oracle even before TDF was announced, is *very* similar to what Apache seems to have been granted.

I cannot see any real difference to the community demands the last years, and I wonder why things seemed to be impossible for the community and TDF, and seem to be possible for ASF.

I do not blame ASF for anything, but, similar to what I read yesterday about your picture of our legal status, I call everyone to be cautious with "rumors". Because they are simply that: Rumors.

Seems like a lot of fuzz is flowing around, at the expense of the truth. Sticking to the facts instead of listening to story-tellers is sometimes helpful.


Florian Effenberger <>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/ @floeff

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.