And finally, whether it would make any sense from the technical point of view for LibreOffice
contributors to even try to participate in OOo at ASF depends very much on what actually ends up
there, and in what direction it is taken by the presumed main driving force, IBM. For all we
know, it might be that the code that is eventually dumped in ASF's SVN (!) is a subset that
doesn't even build, and then IBM starts adding its own hitherto proprietary stuff including build
mechanisms that makes it into a completely different beast than what we are used to. I suspect
lots of Java is involved, and that is not necessarily that popular around here. As if
understanding and using the "old" OOo build mechanisms which have been somewhat adapted at LO
wasn't hard enough.
Good point, Tor. Is the source code available somewhere already?
I wouldn't join any Open Source project if I can't see the source code first :)
--
Jesús Corrius <jesus@softcatala.org>
Document Foundation founding member
Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26
Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.