Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again


On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 05:47:34PM +0200, Pieter E. Zanstra wrote:
From: e-letter [mailto:inpost@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 5:34 PM
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again

What's wrong with reading mailing list messages in digest 
mode and going to the searchable archive as and when appropriate.

Because people never keep focus in email, texting and twitter. Those 
are the worst tools to support a group process. This 25 years old 
technology should have long been abandoned in favour of more knowledge 
based tools for a collaboration.

I don't know what lists you have seen but I've seen quite a number of
looong threads with highly involved posts and equally involved replies.
IMO forums, texting, and twitter appeal to younger users with their
shorter attention spans.

Also, the quality of the answers/help is usually greater on lists than
in forums.

Did it ever occur to you that this 25(?) year old technology is good enough
to have survived that long?


Having watched this space for a month or so, I am about to sign off.

Toodles

-- 
Bob Holtzman
Key ID: 8D549279
"If you think you're getting free lunch,
 check the price of the beer"

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.