Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 19:05 +0200, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/4/21 James Wilde <james.wilde@sunde-wilde.com>

Just got this message in my inbox.  I wonder if sending him a note about
LibO would be considered to be in breach of the comprehensive warning at the
bottom.

//James

Begin forwarded message:

From: SAEED AHMED <SAEED.AHMED@3i-infotech.com>
Date: April 20, 2011 15:34:31 GMT+02:00
To: "users@openoffice.org" <users@openoffice.org>
Subject: [users] Licensing Details
Reply-To: users@openoffice.org

Hi,

We are working and quoting for an upcoming a government opportunity,
which intent to supply around 500 desktops.

The suggested operating system would be Windows 7, and we would like to
propose open office as an Office Suite for all the 500 desktops.

Request to share the details on licensing in case of any.

The Following components need to imply.

1.       Full version  and Perpetual use by client
2.       Patches and Support till the product is supported by
Openoffice.Org

Looking forward to hear from you.

Thanks and  Regards,

Syed Saeed Ahmed, Senior Manager - IT Services and eGovernance, 3i
Infotech Ltd.
Tel.Direct: + 91 22 39814534 | Mobile : + 91 9967014782 | Email:
saeed.ahmed@3i-infotech.com | www.3i-infotech.com



* 3i Infotech wins the "WorldBlu List of Most Democratic Workplaces 2010"
Award

* To file your Tax Returns just in minutes all you need is you
   Visit www.taxsmile.com India's Premier tax filing portal.

This e-mail message may contain confidential,proprietary or legally
privileged information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the
original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this message,
please delete it immediately and notify the sender. The recipient
acknowledges that 3i Infotech or its subsidiaries and associated
companies,(collectively "3i Infotech"), are unable to exercise control or
ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information
contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges that any views
expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and no binding
nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so
expressly with due authority of 3i Infotech. Before opening any attachments
please check them for viruses and defects.


Well, James, as I read that last paragraph above, Mr Ahmed requests those
who have «erroneously received» his posting to notify him in that event.
Thus I presume you are within your rights to contact him whether or no your
receipt of the posting can be considered erroneous. As the paragraph does
not explicitly prohibit mentioning LibO in sucjh a notification, I also
presume that you would be within your rights to do so. The above, of course,
with the caveat that I am hardly an expert in Indian, Singaporean, Thai,
Malaysian, or UK legal practices....

Henri


That's all well and good - but - contacting him is simply _wrong_ IMO.

He asked a question on the OpenOffice.org users list, not LibreOffice. 

To forward such a message here was wrong and such actions should NOT be
tolerated.

Sincerely,

Drew Jensen


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.