On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:22, Kevin Hunter wrote:
In a mathematical sense of "all" I already believe it is not entirely the
fault of OOo/LO. However, I need more information before I will accept this
particular bit of anecdotal evidence. For starters, /how/ did the Yoper
folks get such an increase in speed for OOo? Why have I -- so far -- been
unable to recreate these results on my own machines (which range from old to
fairly new, and run a variety of distros)?
Possibly by tweaking the options. You can get a significant startup
time decrease by adjusting a few things. For example, go to Tools >
Options > Memory and reduce the Graphics cache and memory per object.
Then go to Tools > Options > Java and disable JRE. These two things
make quite a noticeable difference in both the memory footprint, and
the startup time.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.