No difference between LO and OO sofar
Using EPS is in fact not a problem, at condition you start from EPS with
a build in lowres "preview" .
EPS without preview is not "shown' in a document but when printed (using
a postscript printer) like PDF etc.. the Highres images will be in the
PDF document for RGB and CMYK as well.
When using the direct PDF output in LO or OO then the lowres images will
been in the PDF document, what is still a issue for LO and OO PDF creation.
Hope it helps as a workaround ?
PS: Trye to convince your Publisher, Printer not to use EPS anymore,
Postcript has had is best day's, using a RGB workflow with Hyres
RGB-images ( Tif or jpg) in your Documents, is far more simpeler with
same quality outcome.
Hello! I write books containing a lot of EPS images. When I have tried to use
OpenOffice I have not been satisfied with the rendition of the inserted EPS
images. Is LibreOffice better than OpenOffice in this respect?
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy