Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Besides that, distros will have to continue libreoffice-build, which does
still contain patches. (Removing those would be a big regression about
what we ship right now)
Thanks. So some distributions will still need to patch LibreOffice
because the "vanilla" LibreOffice would be a regression for their users
with respect to the current OpenOffice.org/Go-OO/LibreOffice they ship.
This, together with issues like the weird problem you linked to
indeed qualify as "compelling arguments" for distributions needing to
patch LibreOffice much like they do with OpenOffice.org (even though of
course in some cases the patches will be temporary fixes that will
eventually get merged in the main codebase).
Get some clue. And don't speak about this if you don't, kthxbye. ...
Sorry, I apologize
No need. LibreOffice is meritocracy-driven, not politeness-driven.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Linux distros and LibO packaging (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy