Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 11/22/2010 06:31 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 09:03:35AM -0600, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
unsuspecting users to the same problem that OOo has been famous for:
there is no obvious way to start to install the files.  Dependencies for
dpkg -i *.deb?

each .deb have to be met, but nothing indicates the order with which to
install them.  When dealing with 52 .deb files it's like trying to do a
jigsaw puzzle where all distinguishing marks have been filed off.
Nope. Really, I expect anybody having root on a Debian-based system to know
dpkg. Seriously.

This is not the case, many people on debian based systems are new to linux. Linux Mint and Ubuntu both use debian as their base. These are some of the best distros for new users, who usually have a fear of the terminal and typing command arguments.

It would make sense for LibreOffice to make it an easy for new and inexperienced users to both use and test the suite:-) .
It would be much easier if there were a single meta-package that would
act as the start point.  Failing that, at least an ordered list that an
http://packages.debian.org/libreoffice FTR.

Grüße/Regards,

René



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.