On 19 November 2010 15:11, Phil Hibbs <snarks@gmail.com> wrote:
Ian Lynch:
And of course there is the
argument that without certain features some of the large public sector
switches might not have happened.
Back in my teens, my dad and I wrote a Basic interpreter for the PC
based on the Acorn BBC Micro dialect. We went to a computer show, and
I lost count of the number of people who just asked "Is it 100%
compatible?", and when I said "no, but...", they just laughed and
walked off. It's a hard barrier to break through - there are plenty of
people who will say "It doesn't have feature X therefore we'll stick
with Microsoft". Sometimes it's features that can be worked around,
such as only allowing one AutoFilter in a workbook, but someone will
use that as an excuse for declaring a show-stop.
Thing we don't really know is whether a very efficient and compact version
of Writer that supported excellent filters for all the commonly used things
like tables, headings etc and worked in a cell phone would outweigh
anything missing. After all the versions of MS Office for handhelds is only
a subset of the full MS Office. In phones it is not the same barrier as in
PCs,
Phil.
--
Don't you just hate self-referential sigs?
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to
discuss+help@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2Bhelp@documentfoundation.org>
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
--
Ian
Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications
The Schools ITQwww.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940
You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
Re: [tdf-discuss] Why LO mobile version should not be ignored · Valter Mura
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.