Le Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:00:43 +0100,
Andrea Pescetti <email@example.com> a écrit :
On 03/11/2010 Michael Meeks wrote:
I wrote a huge screed on the subject here:
... If the argument is that there is some negotiation with Oracle
that this makes possible - then, I have to wonder why Oracle is
happy to ship millions of lines of Mozilla code (under the MPL)
that they can never own as part of the product.
Yes, more or less that would be my argument. Or, to use your own words
(from your article): "If you are faced with aggression from a
copyright owner, turn their asymmetry against them: ask them to
accept code under the same terms they provide to others. ... Failing
that, just soft-fork the project, a-la MariaDB - paradoxically you
may want to collect copyright assignment yourself to be able to
affect an eventual reconciliation".
What I was hoping was that the Document Foundation would act as a
"trade union" of developers, and be delegated rights on their code to
become a powerful stakeholder in discussing OpenOffice.org and
derivatives. I think I have already repeated enough times that by
this I do NOT mean that I expect/wish that the Document Foundation
gives all the rights to Oracle, of course. But I would expect that,
with a copyright agreement in place, it could get more recognition in
a possible reconciliation phase than what it can get by merely
relying on moral suasion.
What do you think of this idea?
(It does not involve copyright).
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy