On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:04:36 -0600, Ian <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 18:55 +0100, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Il 06/11/2010 17.50, Robert Holtzman ha scritto:
> That's fine as long as those hands remain benevolent. Not always a
If you think so, no foundation is needed at all.
To me, the main reason to have a Foundation is to have a central place
to gather and administer resources. Democratic or benevolent
dictatorship? That is an entirely different debate.
The goal of doing this is to generate income for the foundation, so having
an audit on the administration doesn't really acomplish anything. Just
show distrust to generate income. At the same time, even if such distrust
exist, it doesnt really matter as long as it shows (with actions more than
number) that is reaching it's goal.
In other words, you dont care if a government has corruption inside it's
administration as long as you see performing well. Doing constant audits
doesn't really matter if there is no 'jobs' or whatever is needed in the
You can apply the same thing to any other service public or private.
Liability is a factor of life.
OOoES A.C - http://oooes.org
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to email@example.com
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation · Charles Marcus
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy