Re: [tdf-discuss] why LibO?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On 17/10/2010 04:15, James wrote:
>  Is LibO the official short name for LibreOffice?
> I hate it, it sounds like a system library.
> LO is better.

By reading the lists of discussion, I came to the opinion that this was
the abbreviation that the community was prefering, that is why for beta2
I changed the occurences of LO in the build to LibO.

Please, could you come to an agreement? If the agreement is different, I
can change it back for beta3, but would not like to do this ping-pong
anymore after that, since it makes the upgrades just a pain.

I really don't have any love/hate relationship with software name, so
let the community decide.

Cheers

Fridrich

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAky6n9wACgkQu9a1imXPdA8idwCeMcSqAetBWkS0xhlTlniq1As4
DwUAn2RUO647BBsvUPI9V1wJxpH+Z4g3
=0Dk2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted