On 10/08/2010 05:18 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
the Document Foundation does not take the copyright of its contributors
. So we should not be listed as copyright owners.
Document Foundation has a copyright in the selection of the code that is
used for the specific version of the program. This is different from the
copyright that the individual contributors of the code have. This is
also different from any assignment of copyright that Document Foundation
might have.
I'm being extremely picky here, but it comes down to the
derivative/compilation issue, and who owns which copyrights to what.
jonathon
--
No human will see non-list, non-bulk, non-junk email sent to this address
.
It all gets forwarded to /dev/null
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.