Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

IMHO, democracy is better than others ways election. But how to make a
choice is difficult.

Sophie has mention meritocracy and I think it is better than democracy.
I agree with Sophie!
But I believe that metitocracy need the democracy for be effective.
Because... How do we know who deserves each position? The voting is
(IMHO) the answer.
For how long time be a representative?

It is going to be defined but 1-year-long sounds good for me.
And me too!

I propose that here decide the first step for this question, and choice
the first group of representatives that direct TDF.
For the first time, I think we can let the "foundation" decide

And from the second time, we vote, like the way Apache does:

In this election, could choose the dependents of each key area in TDF
(like: l10n, QA, DEV, etc.)

Is good for me too... but we can decide urgent, the leaders in each key
area. For the organization of them self.

There is much work to be done and the organization is the first step.

Prof. Román H. Gelbort

10 años usando, libre, gratuito y seguro

To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.