[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RE : Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO

Hi all,

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Stefan Weigel
<stefan.weigel@bildungskreis.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> Am 03.11.2010 14:54, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
>> Hi,
>> Top posting from my phone...
>> This is not an easy answer to give. Both strategies have pros and cons. My
>> advice would be to start where we are but alter the numbering scheme wildly:
>> 3.3, 3.5 and then 4.0 instead of 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 like OOo.
> Ever considered a ubuntu-like numbering? (My personal favorite)
> 10.10 (October 2010)
> 11.04 (April 2011)

I also like the ubuntu-like numbering. What about a mix of both?

Using your examples:

Or maybe that is just too much for an average user? :)

Jesús Corrius <jesus@softcatala.org>
Document Foundation founding member
Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius

E-mail to steering-discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

RE : Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO"Charles-H. Schulz" <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>
Re: RE : Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibOStefan Weigel <stefan.weigel@bildungskreis.org>
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.