Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2022 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi!

Thanks for your calm reflections, Michael.

On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:30 PM Michael Weghorn <m.weghorn@posteo.de> wrote:


Looking at the diff between the 2 proposals: While there seem to be
different approaches in some bigger questions (like management, tasks of
developers), some seem to be more of a cosmetic nature.
Without knowing how the process works exactly:
While I don't really expect that there will be a consensus in all
aspects, I'm wondering whether trying to minimize the diff between the
proposals before doing a vote would be reasonable, so there's consensus
in as many aspects as possible.


Just to amplify this, I have been trying to contribute to this activity but
having two (complicated) documents makes it hard to make contributions.
Kendy made a merged version and shared it with us all and it would be
really good if contributors could stick with improving that one and getting
it to a state where there's maximum consensus between the directors (and
hopefully the rest of us who are contributing but obviously Board agreement
needs to be the priority. It's really a waste of time to cherry-pick and
update a legacy document instead of the one multiple people have been
working on.

Cheers

Simon
-- 
*Simon Phipps*
*TDF Trustee*

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.