Thanks for your calm reflections, Michael.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:30 PM Michael Weghorn <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Looking at the diff between the 2 proposals: While there seem to be
different approaches in some bigger questions (like management, tasks of
developers), some seem to be more of a cosmetic nature.
Without knowing how the process works exactly:
While I don't really expect that there will be a consensus in all
aspects, I'm wondering whether trying to minimize the diff between the
proposals before doing a vote would be reasonable, so there's consensus
in as many aspects as possible.
Just to amplify this, I have been trying to contribute to this activity but
having two (complicated) documents makes it hard to make contributions.
Kendy made a merged version and shared it with us all and it would be
really good if contributors could stick with improving that one and getting
it to a state where there's maximum consensus between the directors (and
hopefully the rest of us who are contributing but obviously Board agreement
needs to be the priority. It's really a waste of time to cherry-pick and
update a legacy document instead of the one multiple people have been
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy