Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [steering-discuss] Base - a new mailing list?

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Tom Davies <> wrote:
HI :)
Base needs to have some documentation to help devs understand what it's trying to do.

With the other apps it's much easier to have an overview even without having any documentation 
but Base is a lot more complex.  Also there needs to be some discussion between devs and other 
people to decide what to use instead of java, and the direction to take generally.  Apparently 
the default HqSql back-end is fairly troublesome but there is a new project "MariaDb" that is a 
drop-in replacement for MySql that might be much better as a back-end.  MariaDb is basically 
almost the entire community that worked on MySql including some of the original people plus a 
load of new people that joined since the project broke free from Sun/Oracle.

MariaDB is like MySql, so it is a nice and powerful database, but too
heavy weight(*) for a 'default' back-end. SQLite sound like a much
better match for the task.

(*) by too heavy weight, I'm referring to installation, configuration,
need for started-task/daemon, need for periodic maintenance etc...

Anyway it needs a small team of people to try out different back-ends to see which are viable as 
back-ends and which might be easiest to have as the default one.  Perhaps bringing their 
recommendation back to steering-discuss to make an informed vote.

That's not how it works... voting is not the answer... doing is. I'm
pretty sure that if somebody step up to make a viable support for a
self-contained back-end, it will fidn its way into the code by
consensus, without the need for a 'vote', or getting the steering
commity or future BoD involved in any ways.
BTW this is already listed as an 'Easy Hack' :
So clearly this is not a technical/political disagreement, but just a
matter of  someone stepping up to do the work...

As i understand it the current infra-structure is leading to Base gently crumbling away through 

It is not an infrastructure problem. it is a lack of interest problem.

  Experienced devs steer well away from Base.  New ones need to learn more understanding about 
coding or about Base or about both.  Every time an individual joins and is keen to work on some 
aspect of Base they realise it's a completely tangled mess and they would be the only person 
working on it so they get discouraged and give-up.

That is true for every part of the product. the effort needed to find
your way in the code is high, and base is not special in that regard.
I seriously doubt that it is easier to find your way around writer
than it is to find your way around base.

Yes it would be great to have input from the entire devs list but
1.  They are not interested in Base
That is indeed a problem, but I fail to see how starting to section
the community vertically ( vs horizontally like the ml are now) will

2.  The non-coders that want to do non-coding work on Base (eg Documentation, perhaps marketing, 
perhaps design of aspects of the UI that only appear in Base, the wizards and so on) would be 
unable to understand.

I don't understand what you mean with that paragraph...


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.