Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Le 06/07/11 11:48, Tom Davies a écrit :

Everyone : To me, the point has more to do with SC communication. Once
again, a topic has raised its head that I considered "dealt with", and
now it is back on the table.

Although not a member of the SC, the question of the legality of
screenshot usage and associated platforms for making them has become
important enough IMO for a decision to be clearly stated by the SC, so I
am submitting this question as a topic for discussion to you all.

If there is already a decision somewhere in the archives, or on the
wiki, could someone from the SC please point us to it ?

If not, please consider this question for discussion as quickly as
possible and issue a statement.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.