Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


updated the text again following David, Cor, andMichael's notes...
sometimes :-)

Otherwise, I do believe Drew's point is a very good one, that's why I
added a new subsection in the end, on "Solemn Address and Impeachment
of the BoD". 

Please let me know if that's something you like.



Le Sat, 4 Dec 2010 06:38:58 +0800,
David Nelson <> a écrit :

Hi, :-)

I must admit that I have great reservations about the BoD being able
to change the bylaws without a vote by community members. Even the
6-out-of-9 minimum vote does not give sufficient guarantee for me. And
even the stipulation that there will always be one member, one vote is
not a total reassurance. I'd prefer bylaws that are carefully thought
out now but that are pretty much in stone once adopted.

I think I'd prefer a community that is frequently called upon to vote,
but that has full control over its future. You expect community
members to be committed in working for LibreOffice, so one should also
expect them to take their "civic rights and duties" seriously and be
ready to think about issues regularly, and to vote as often as is
necessary. At least they'll be able to claim that there is true

Does anyone feel like answering me about this? ;-)

David Nelson

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.