[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tdf-discuss] [MAILING LIST] interim structuring - a proposal


Cor Nouws wrote:
> Also I think QA@ is a good thing.
>
I think I fundamentally disagree on this one - the interface between
QA and Dev is incredibly huge, I'd even venture the proposition that
ideally there's no difference (in core competencies - maybe there is
one in attitude ;)) - at any rate, the chasm between the OpenOffice
project's QA and Dev teams is something I *do not* want to
transplant into our new project.

Ideally, I want QA folks to take notice if the Devs start debating
details of specific features, and conversely, I want Devs to take
notice of QA talking about specific "problem areas" in the product.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Follow-Ups:
Re: [tdf-discuss] [MAILING LIST] interim structuring - a proposalVolker Merschmann <merschmann@gmail.com>
References:
[tdf-discuss] [MAILING LIST] interim structuring - a proposalBernhard Dippold <bernhard@familie-dippold.at>
Re: [tdf-discuss] [MAILING LIST] interim structuring - a proposalCor Nouws <oolst@nouenoff.nl>
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.