Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


The way I have seen this actually is that it usually checks your system to
see if the GPU is compatible or not.


On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster <
webmaster@krackedpress.com> wrote:

On 07/28/2013 12:09 PM, Pedro wrote:

Hi Michael, all


Michael Meeks-2 wrote

        There are very significant optimisations for the software only
core
that will make very much faster even if you have no GPU, we hope they
will also make it use very much less memory too for 4.2 - but that work
is ongoing.

I was kind of hoping that some of that code was already included in the
current master :)

After a brief test with the newest build (Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 8b96cfd6caedbad7b3b79e57421a83**4f18c5c511
TinderBox: Win-x86@6-debug, Branch:master, Time: 2013-07-27_22:47:00)
I quickly found out that it is not so.

I tested on my home nettop (a Nvidia ION based system with a 2Cores x 2
Threads Intel Atom 330 which supports OpenCL and CUDA according to
TechPowerUp's GPU-Z v0.7.2)

BTW why are there only Debug daily versions available for Windows? Was
this
a change of plans or is it just a coincidence?

Are Debug builds slower (less efficient) than non-debug?

Cheers,
Pedro


I have a question about this. . .

With the "GPU" computing power concept, will there be a GPU powered
version and non-GPU powered version or with there be one version that will
look to see if the system has a "compatible" GPU processor and use it when
available?

What little I have dealt with GPU-based computing, I have only seen
packages that either use GPU "only" [or as much as possible], or CPU
processing.  I have never seen a package that looks at the system and
decided what type of processor to use.  As far as I was told, you must
"compile" your code for GPU processing or for CPU processing.  Well, that
was what I was told when I was dealing with some "number crunching"
packages.  They offered the CPU version, the CUDA-GPU version, and the
API-GPU version, as the different versions for their "crunching" packages.

So,it seem to me if we make LO run on the GPU, then it would be a
different version than running it on the system's CPU.  Of course, that
does not take into account any OS option that runs its system on a
GPU-based system and is acting as the "shell" to allow non-GPU packages to
run on a GPU.


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: 
discuss+unsubscribe@**documentfoundation.org<discuss%2Bunsubscribe@documentfoundation.org>
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
unsubscribe/<http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/>
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
Netiquette <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>
List archive: 
http://listarchives.**documentfoundation.org/www/**discuss/<http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/>
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.