Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [tdf-discuss] Licenses for extensions

On 8 Mar 2012, at 10:16, Flavio Moringa wrote:

I guys,

I have a simple doubt about the licensing scheme to be used for building

I known that to be published on the extensions web site they have to have
an Open Source Licence (GPL, BSD,etc...)

But if you just want to make an extension for any purpose, and you don't
need it to be published, can any license be used? Even a closed source one?

You are always free to release your own source code under any license you wish. If you re-use code 
from any source you will naturally need to comply with the terms of the license, but there's no 
inherent need to do this for most extensions.

Is there any connection between libreoffice's license and the extensions
license? Does it also apply to

There might be in certain circumstances where there are issues; you should consult an expert 
privately as mailing lists are not the place to get such advice. But in the general case, there are 
unlikely to be licensing issues affecting extensions caused by the licensing of LibreOffice or or, when they release their first version, Apache Open Office.

Hope that helps,


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.