Hi again Don
donald_harbison wrote
What matters most is to help end users understand the benefits of ODF as
their file format, and improve interoperability with the dominance of
MS-Office formats.
I agree with you that joining forces (instead of fighting for the crumbles
and let MS keep all the cake) makes a LOT of sense.
But I think that more important than each house wasting time and resources
building their own version of an Office Suite, it would be much more useful
to make ODF a really compatible and superior file format.
My 2 cents ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/IBM-is-alive-tp3715436p3724302.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [tdf-discuss] Re: Re: IBM is alive ;) (continued)
(message not available)
(message not available)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.