Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

[tdf-discuss] Re: Status of .docX etc.



"e-letter" <inpost@gmail.com> wrote in message news:CAET1fe6jeCR1769v-0yaDhUMw78v0pH4P2O+0T1jeg9B8=eC2w@mail.gmail.com...
On 13/12/2011, Harold Fuchs <hwfa.gmanenews@gmail.com> wrote:
Would someone please either explain or point me at a detailed explanation of
the current status of  LO vis à vis the "new" MS office document formats
docx, xlsx etc.


Here we go again: please explain why you can't afford to buy m$???

Have you written to m$ to ask for an explanation why: (1) m$ cannot
write to odf standards;

(2) m$ cannot write to m$ooxml itself


I don't want to buy m$. I don't want to engage with m$. But occasionally I need to be able to exchange documents with other, less enlightened people. As Aleksandr Orlov would say: simples.

--
Harold Fuchs
London, England


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.