Re: [tdf-discuss] feature expansion or bug minimisation?

Sometimes missing a core feature is a bug, and fixing a bug is adding a 
feature (particularly if its making an existing feature more 
~discoverable~).

So it might be necessary to establish an importance ~hierarchy~ for 
bugs/features, to determine when something really overlaps both areas. 
Smaller stuff might be more cut and dry of course, i.e., X is a feature 
and Y is a bug. But there is some grey area too.

Just my 2 cents.


On 08/11/2011 11:55 AM, e-letter wrote:
> Readers,
>
> A recent feature request prompted the strategic question: what is more
> important, minimising bugs or adding new features?
>
> Of course, the ideal answer is to do both (;)), but remember, the
> question is to choose only one answer...


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted