Re: [tdf-discuss] feature expansion or bug minimisation?
Sometimes missing a core feature is a bug, and fixing a bug is adding a
feature (particularly if its making an existing feature more
So it might be necessary to establish an importance ~hierarchy~ for
bugs/features, to determine when something really overlaps both areas.
Smaller stuff might be more cut and dry of course, i.e., X is a feature
and Y is a bug. But there is some grey area too.
Just my 2 cents.
On 08/11/2011 11:55 AM, e-letter wrote:
A recent feature request prompted the strategic question: what is more
important, minimising bugs or adding new features?
Of course, the ideal answer is to do both (;)), but remember, the
question is to choose only one answer...
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- Re: [tdf-discuss] feature expansion or bug minimisation? · anthropornis
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy