Le 11/06/11 10:54, Francois Tigeot a écrit :
Hi François,
Oh, I'm really indifferent about it; what I'm concerned about is the hardcoded
list of platforms determining whether the client library is build or not.
Agreed.
I'd like to remove this list, and either build the adabas client library for
all systems or not at all.
There's no need to have artificial platform differences in the code which make
porting to new platforms or future maintainance more difficult.
If Adabas D really is abandonware, we could kill two birds with one stone.
Agreed again. All platforms or nothing seems fair enough. I don't really
understand why it was never made available for Mac, guess the owners of
Adabas D never thought it was worthwhile.
Alex
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Adabas database usage (continued)
[tdf-discuss] Re: Adabas database usage · Alexander Thurgood
[tdf-discuss] Re: Adabas database usage · Alexander Thurgood
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.