Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

But can't it simply say RC2 somewhere so that *USERS* KNOW which version
they have?

Think harder. The point is that if a Release Candidate build is determined to be
good *enough* to be released, the *exact* *same* *bits* will become the release
then instead. Just the names of the download directories, downloadable file, etc
are changed as necessary. So if the Help:About would say RC2, and RC2 would be
turned into a release, then the release would also say RC2. Which would be
confusing, wouldn't it?

This said, sure, we (developers) are well aware that the information in the
Help:About dialog is less useful than it could be. The mention of OOo "master
workspace" names and "milestones" (the "OOO340m1") is becoming more and more
meaningless. Also the "build number" is mostly pointless, one version number
corresponding to our tarball release number should be enough.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.