Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hello everyone,

thought I share this with you. I have posted it as a reply to the marketing mailing list, where a discussion is going on currently.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [marketing-dev] Why TDF should be the place for one united Community
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:03:26 +0200
From: Florian Effenberger <>
Organization: The Document Foundation

Hello everyone,

I have not been subscribed to this list for months, but due to Louis'
recent Cc, I was made aware of the discussion going on -- so, as a
representant of TDF, but also as someone for whom personally the
community means a lot, let me say a few words.

I indeed see the current situation as an ideal basis for uniting things.
The diversity the Community is in now doesn't help anyone. If you now
think we, TDF, are happy and get satisfaction out of the current
situation, you are terribly wrong. Even if we expected something like
that to happen, our intention was to safeguard the project from this
eventuality, not to profit from it.

We all have similar goals: a free office suite, available to everyone.
So let's not discuss about the past, about what has happened and about
the reasons that led to this, but rather focus on the future.

I want to openly repeat our invitation to everyone to join The Document
Foundation and the LibreOffice Community. Why do I think that we are the
right place to continue the work?

In yesterday's blog post, we summed up where we stand, and reading it
will help to understand the current situation:

1. We are vendor neutral. I am sorry that I have to object to Louis'
statement of us being a proxy for Microsoft -- nothing can be further
from the truth. I must confess, that by statements like these, I feel
even personally insulted. I spend many hours per day on a pure volunteer
basis, and if anyone can point on those of my doings that are proxying
for Microsoft, I would be interested to hear them. Otherwise, I'll ask
to stop spreading those wrong assumptions -- as they are simply that: wrong.

2. We have a strong legal backing, not only by the German nonprofit
"Freies Office Deutschland e.V.", but also by the Software in the Public
Interest (SPI), and we are on track with establishing the Foundation as
a legal entity. Even right now, we have all options needed for dealing
with legal aspects, accepting and spending money. We already can and do
maintain trademarks, brands and other assets.

3. We have an independent infrastructure that works and is not
controlled by nor depends on a single entity. In addition, as we are not
using a fixed web framework, we are very flexible in what we do.

4. We have not only gained a lot of momentum, but also a strong
developer base of more than 200 volunteers, amongst them 40 who
contribute on a very regular basis. Yes, of course, any contribution
corporations with paid developers do are highly welcome and help a lot
-- but already right now, we are in a status where we could drive the
project without them, if the worst case would occur. This is something
we never managed to achieve in ten years' of

When I first read the Oracle announcement from April, talking about an
independent, noncommercial entity, my first thoughts were -- and still
are -- "this is exactly what TDF is doing". I have seen proposals of
setting up another foundation, or moving to an existing foundation that
is not TDF. Honestly, this does not make very much sense to me. It would
again lead to a diversity, would require many efforts, and would
continue to irritate the market at large.

Why reinvent the wheel? is already very special in many
of its processes. Having it under the umbrella of another, existing
entity, would require lots of changes to fit in there. TDF has, from the
very beginning, been shaped as a new entity with processes that fit to
what we have accomplished the last years. We changed things that didn't
work, and improved things that do work -- isn't this the best basis to
build on? Let's not waste energy in once again trying to fit under an
umbrella, but rather work jointly together on our future.

I am not saying that TDF does everything right and 100% perfect. We are
giving our best, and I think we do a fairly good job. I've seen comments
that TDF is missing big corporate support, and that the whole ecosystem
is at risk. Again, I consider this terribly wrong. Of course, we would
love to have much more support from corporations already, but building
this up needs time, requires trust and confidence, and after all,
support is growing rapidly. If anyone thinks by setting up a new
foundation or by doing a few phone calls you can get big corporate
support, I must say that almost sounds delusionary. And does it really
make sense that in the future, two entities will try that out? Wouldn't
it be much better to speak united, with one voice?

In my letter of resignation last October
(, I've
said that I am looking forward to talking again about options to
cooperate. I feel that time has come now.

So, I would be really interested of what actually prevents from
cooperating with TDF, and uniting once again. Are there any valid
reasons? Let's leave out what happened in the past -- a lot of bad words
have been said, but digging into that does not help.

What compelling reasons are there to not work together again, in one

TDF is there, TDF is open, and to me, it would be the ideal home of a
united Community. The decision about that requires no leader, but you,
anyone of you, can make it on your own.

Our future can be bright. Let's make it together.


Florian Effenberger <>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/ @floeff
To unsubscribe send email to
For additional commands send email to
with Subject: help

Florian Effenberger <>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/ @floeff

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.