It already has been fixed on the wiki page, when I just looked on the page
it appears there as valid with all correct information. If it hadn't I would
have edited and contacted the page owner.
-Sonic
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:18 PM, NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
If you are a wikipedia member/contributor, perhaps you can have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenDocument_software
No mention of LibreOffice.
However, before updating the page, be aware of:
<
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user/4599
[ODF format validity]
(read the entire thread - including the 'Continue reading' bits)
Or, try to look up the thread on:
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
(good luck with that)
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.