On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Tom Davies <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
________________________________
From: planas <jslozier@gmail.com>
To: users@libreoffice.org
Sent: Mon, 18 April, 2011 4:28:00
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Ellison's Oracle washes hands of OpenOffice
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 21:41 -0400, Wayne Borean wrote:
In that case, you can see where I'm leading the conversation, and why my
concept of 'Free Software Darwinism' could be really important to us, and
scary as hell to Microsoft.
Wayne
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:12 PM, plino <pedlino@gmail.com> wrote:
@Wayne
Being a biologist, I find your Evolution parallel quite interesting.
Answering your previous question: of course IBM has it's own flavour of
Office (based on OpenOffice in fact): it's called IBM Lotus Symphony
http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/home.nsf/products
Enjoy! ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Ellison-s-Oracle-washes-hands-of-OpenOffice-tp2826546p2832723.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
Wayne
I would think some the hardware vendors would promote FOSS more. They
can benefit from the hardware sales. I can see why MS hates FOSS, they
are almost a pure software vendor and FOSS hurts their sales.
Jay Lozier
Jslozier@gmail.com
Hello,
Am gonna try two things with this e-mail,
1. As noted earlier, the users@documentfoundation.org list is for user
support and not for discussions. Therefore, I am moving to the discuss
list.
Hi :)
unfortunately hardware vendors profit from selling MS pre-installed and the more
junk they can have pre-installed the more they profit. MS sells them special
licences to install at a discount bargain rate. If hardware vendors put Free
Software on instead then their profit margins would be lower.
2. This has been claimed so many times but still it does not make it
correct. The difference is in the details.
Computer manufacturers build computers with different hardware and
software components. For example, Intel produces CPUs, and it was
revealed recently that they gave special discounts to Dell so that
they get exclusivity,
http://money.cnn.com/2010/07/27/news/companies/dell_settlement_intel.fortune/index.htm
The case with Microsoft is that computer manufacturers can stay in
line and follow special programs to co-advertise Windows (“Dell
recommends Windows”) and use Windows exclusively for their products,
and thus get generous discounts over the standard OEM Windows price.
This is the anticompetitive practice that hurts the market.
The exact details of such an agreement has not been leaked yet, so
that we can have hard evidence. The part that looks to be in these
agreements is that if the manufacturer decides to go exclusive with
Windows for their products, they get even better discounts.
If you try to buy something with NO software on it then the hardware actually
costs more so people buy stuff that already had MS pre-installed even if they
don't want to use it and then wipe the MS stuff to install Linux or Bsd or
something.
The manufacturer is in a position to sell you a computer cheaper if it
does not have Windows (or any other OS). You can see in the Asian
markets manufacturers such as Acer, Asus and HP offering the same
computer with or without Windows, no questions asked.
The issue that the manufacturers have to deal with is that, if they
some a computer (in US, EU) without Windows, they do not get the best
discount for their Windows licenses, FOR their other computers with
Windows preinstalled.
See some examples at http://simos.info/blog/archives/1021
Simos
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [tdf-discuss] Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Ellison's Oracle washes hands of OpenOffice · Simos Xenitellis
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.