At 18:59 16/02/2011, drew wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 17:30 +0000,
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Joanie,
> > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 16:24 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > > * Is there an active a11y team and/or developers focused on
> > > a11y issues in LibreOffice?
> >
> > Sure there are people with a focus on this. I am not sure if we
> > actually can speak of 'a team'.
>
> Quite - whether there is a team at OO.o is a similar
question ;-) there
> are people who can help fix problems. From ORCA's perspective, I created
> the design, prototype, and ~50% of the existing atk bridge in vcl; so I
> wouldn't fret that we are skill-less in this area :-)
>
> Furthermore, it is far easier to work on LibreOffice process-wise to
> get fixes in, so I anticipate (over time) a better accessibility
> experience; and of course we welcome patches (on the dev list).
>
Hi, If I may change the subject here for a moment. When lasted I
noted any comment on the OO.o lists with regard to the IAccessibilty
code coming from IBM, IIRC, the comment was that it was 'not yet
integrated' - I don't know if that is still true.
As far as I know, the IAccessible2 code is in the OOo repository but
not in the main trunk. At FOSDEM (two week ago), Malte Timmermann
could not give a date when the integration (and testing) would be
finished: "It will be done when it's done."
(See my summary at
<http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/accessibility/msg00034.html>.)
Best regards,
Christophe
From LibreOffice stand point, I am not sure I have heard what the
plan is, would that integration be merged here? (if the answer is
still don't know till we see it - that's a valid answer) I remember
watching the session on accessibility at the last OOoConn and I
know there was a MS rep there, as I remember you had some small
interaction. I'm don't know then if your (the dev teams) thoughts
are to look for the integration coming via OO.o/IBM or if you are
looking at going a different route. Please don't feel you need to
respond directly - if there are some references already (other
emails, blogs) it would be great if anyone could point in the
direction of those. This next period there are number of shows in
the US and the question of accessibility is treated quite directly
in this area. I was thinking of trying to create a small reference
piece for the booth staff at the shows with some information on
this subject (within this next 2 weeks - to make the first show):
LIbreOffice support for accessibility technologies (current and
future) [or something similar] I'm starting with the assumption
that anything relating to OO.o 3.3 would be correct also for Libo
3.3 - correct assumption? Beyond that - I'm not asking for a direct
response here to this email, but if that assumption is not correct,
or there are actual plans for a different direction for integration
it would be much appreciated if anyone could direct some links my
way, I will read and assemble a smaller flyer type piece, then ask
folks to review it.
Thanks for your time,
Drew
--
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
Twitter: @RabelaisA11y
---
"Better products and services through end-user empowerment"
www.usem-net.eu - www.stand4all.eu
---
Please don't invite me to Facebook, Quechup or other "social
networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.