On 07/11/2010 Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
The last minutes of the SC meeting explains that we will revisit the issue
once the Foundation is properly established.
...which means that at that point the only feasible solution will be to
ask for agreement/assignment on a voluntary basis, or even reject
completely this possibility.
But, at the same time, waiting a few months will allow to finally
discriminate whether the 50 or so new developers joined primarily
because the required technical skills were lowered or because the
copyright assignment was removed; if the removal of a copyright
assignment was the main reason, then I see all of them moving to more
substantial contributions by that time (and LibreOffice progressing
dramatically!).
Best regards,
Andrea.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.