Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

----- Original message -----
Hi Alexandro,

On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 17:28 -0600, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
represent some advantages. Certainly the development cost will be 
disipated since the toolkit would be mantained by a broader community.

    Having finally rid ourselves of one corporate controlled, mandatory
corporate copyright ownership aggregation problem area, I don't want to
import another one, just lower down the stack.



--  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

hi Michael 
I agree with that point however this toolkit is GPL and also has a dynamic of being adopted by 
other mobile platforms like meego. Just to weight the pros and con on the topic of separating the 
engine from the toolkit and adopting into other toolkits. Not sure how the other toolkits in 
android or iphone can provide. 
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to
Posting guidelines:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.