Hello,
As someone who is interested in LibreOffice, but does not have enough
programming experience to contribute, I was just going to lurk on this
forum to satisfy my curiosity, but...
On 24/10/10 13:01, RGB ES wrote:
Even if editing any kind of graphics is a "nice to have" feature, I
think LibO need to build a solid base first. There are already good
open source apps to do the job so integrating with those apps
(properly embed/display/export-to-pdf of svg/eps files, for example)
will pay more than going for "the one office suite to rule them all".
We need to make what we have rock solid before going for more. The big
risk of adding every possible feature is to end with something like
this:
http://www.inventosabsurdos.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/trinacria-cutlery.jpg
pretty, but useless.
Just my 2 ยข
I would agree strongly with this. As someone who has used OOo for
several years, my criticisms of it would be that it is slow to load and
that it has occasional glitches such as refusing to format some text
correctly for no reason that I can figure out, rather than any lack of
features. I would prefer to see LO put a high priority on ease of use of
existing features and reliability, rather than become a bloated monster
with numerous features which only a very small percentage of users will
want and which may not be completely reliable. Personally, if I want to
incorporate graphics in a document, I am not bothered by having to edit
images using an appropriate program before importing them into the
document, and I suspect that is the case for most people.
Now for some wishful thinking. My ideal word processor would be modular,
consisting of a core program with all the features that most people will
use, plus a number of optional modules to enable features, such as mail
merge, used only by a minority. With Ubuntu, for example, the install CD
could then include a much leaner version of LO, within which would be
the facility to install (and even uninstall) additional modules as
required. This could even allow the possibility of having two
alternative modules for much the same purpose.
Les.
______________________________________________
This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
http://www.netintelligence.com/email
--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.