Le 2010-10-15 12:30, Eric Hoch a écrit :
Wouldn't it be better to allow the user to select which extensions [s]he
wants to install, adding a special [warning] note to ones that require JRE?
For the end-user I favor this too but companies may want a vanilla
OOo without any extensions or the chance to disable the
installations by default during the silent installation process or
whichever process is chosen to install larger amounts of OOo on
company PCs.
Eric
I would be careful in trimming too many extensions. People coming from
MSOffice will expect full compatibility and if it is not there, and they
have to "work" at it to get it to do the same thing, well, we will lose
them. We should make sure that LibO is as able (at it's most minimal
state) to do as much as MSOffice. Don't trim off extensions to the point
where the vanilla version does less.
Marc
--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.