[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [steering-discuss] Community bylaws
- Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Community bylaws
- From: Cor Nouws <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:02:42 +0100
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Volker Merschmann wrote (16-11-10 22:14)
I have a question about the Board of Directors. I see that the draft saysIn this point I'm with Cor.
all members are chosen every year (from the Community Members) and that one
can be member only twice consecutively.
Has been considered that this leads to a situation where each year people
have to get used to the tasks, the other board members etc. so that maybe it
is a bit inefficient?
The duties of the BOD as written in
are of high importance for the development of the whole project and
therefore long-term-orientated. They will be the premium contact for
other projects, authorities, commercial contributors etc.
I would recommend to drop the re-election limit in favor for a
continous work of the BOD.
A limit to re-election is good to get fresh blood and to prevent people becoming part of the furniture.
And two years twice makes four. So that is pretty OK to benefit from learning a job, the contacts etc. IMO,
- giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation -
E-mail to email@example.com for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
|Re: [steering-discuss] Community bylaws||"Charles-H. Schulz" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|[steering-discuss] Community bylaws||"Charles-H. Schulz" <email@example.com>|
|Re: [steering-discuss] Community bylaws||Cor Nouws <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Re: [steering-discuss] Community bylaws||Volker Merschmann <email@example.com>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [steering-discuss] Community bylaws
- Next by Date: Re: [steering-discuss] Community bylaws
- Previous by thread: Re: [steering-discuss] Community bylaws
- Next by thread: Re: [steering-discuss] Community bylaws