I have wollmux installed
With the latest released version from last year from December 30 2022, you
need JRE 11.
I'm using Windows 11, the wollmux.conf must look like this
Unfortunately, not all templates are found yet, even though they are in the
I don't think an extra WollMux mailing list makes not sense. This does not
promote the awareness of wollmux.
Possibly. Perhaps mark the subject with [WollMux]?
Von: Thorsten Behrens <email@example.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Januar 2023 13:26
An: Marina Latini <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: TDF Board Discussion <email@example.com>
Betreff: Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document
Hi Marina, all,
Marina Latini wrote:
No no, it makes sense to keep WollMux under the LibreOffice org, I
agree. If you are fine with the current status, can we start to work on
I'd love to! :)
(Gabor is getting the last few handbook pages' existing German translation
put up on the wiki; and I'll see to get at least a basic CI job setup going
by early next week - but none of that should block others from starting the
But, apart from WollMux... I think we could take this opportunity also
for a clean-up of repos in https://github.com/tdf. ;) You mentioned
the DLP libraries, but libcmis is hosted under the TDF organisation,
and, if I'm not mistaken, the libraries from the DLP aren't
LibreOffice only but can be reused also elsewhere.
Yep, that's true - Calligra, Inkscape and Scribus use at least some of them.
Under the TDF organisation there are also other repos that should
probably be archived (but we are going semi off-topic now). ;)
Also true, e.g. when looking at website stuff. BTW, 'archiving' on github is
something conceptually very close to our atticization - we should evaluate
setting the archive flag within that framework IMO.
We could also mention that we have the other LibreOffice organisation
and cross link from tdf to LibreOffice too.
Given that the main readme was misleading you, that's certainly useful.
But...for this clean-up, where we can continue this discussion? this
list doesn't look like the right place to me. :)
Doesn't feel terribly off-topic here (dev list would also not be a 100%
on-topic match, neither website or marketing? - but for very generic
discussions, there's always the global discuss list of course).
Something else - does anybody see the need for a dedicated wollmux mailing
list? I didn't ask for one (and actually try to avoid silo-ed low-traffic
email lists, and nudge people onto the main dev list), but not strictly
against one either. The old wollmux project had one at joinup IIRC, but it's
dormant since a long time.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy