AW: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation

Hi all, 
Hi Marina, 

I have wollmux installed
With the latest released version from last year from December 30 2022, you
need JRE 11. 

I'm using Windows 11, the wollmux.conf must look like this
DEFAULT_CONTEXT "./config/"
%include "./config/conf/main.conf"
%include "./config/conf/wollmuxbar_standard.conf"

Unfortunately, not all templates are found yet, even though they are in the
correct folder. 

I don't think an extra WollMux mailing list makes not sense. This does not
promote the awareness of wollmux.
Possibly.  Perhaps mark the subject with [WollMux]?

Greetings
Susanne

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Thorsten Behrens <thb@libreoffice.org> 
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Januar 2023 13:26
An: Marina Latini <marina.latini@libreoffice.org>
Cc: TDF Board Discussion <board-discuss@documentfoundation.org>
Betreff: Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document
Foundation

Hi Marina, all,

Marina Latini wrote:
> No no, it makes sense to keep WollMux under the LibreOffice org, I 
> agree. If you are fine with the current status, can we start to work on
WollMux?
>
I'd love to! :)

(Gabor is getting the last few handbook pages' existing German  translation
put up on the wiki; and I'll see to get at least a basic  CI job setup going
by early next week - but none of that should block  others from starting the
work)

> But, apart from WollMux... I think we could take this opportunity also 
> for a clean-up of repos in https://github.com/tdf. ;) You mentioned 
> the DLP libraries, but libcmis is hosted under the TDF organisation, 
> and, if I'm not mistaken, the libraries from the DLP aren't 
> LibreOffice only but can be reused also elsewhere.
Yep, that's true - Calligra, Inkscape and Scribus use at least some of them.

> Under the TDF organisation there are also other repos that should 
> probably be archived (but we are going semi off-topic now). ;)
Also true, e.g. when looking at website stuff. BTW, 'archiving' on github is
something conceptually very close to our atticization - we should evaluate
setting the archive flag within that framework IMO.

> We could also mention that we have the other LibreOffice organisation 
> and cross link from tdf to LibreOffice too.
Given that the main readme was misleading you, that's certainly useful.

> But...for this clean-up, where we can continue this discussion? this 
> list doesn't look like the right place to me. :)
Doesn't feel terribly off-topic here (dev list would also not be a 100%
on-topic match, neither website or marketing? - but for very generic
discussions, there's always the global discuss list of course).

Something else - does anybody see the need for a dedicated wollmux mailing
list? I didn't ask for one (and actually try to avoid silo-ed low-traffic
email lists, and nudge people onto the main dev list), but not strictly
against one either. The old wollmux project had one at joinup IIRC, but it's
dormant since a long time.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy