Hi Andreas, all,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
Thus the board has to amend the result at least. And if the vote of the
member with a CoI was decisive the proposal was rejected.
Our current CoI policy makes some helpful distinctions between an
interest in something, and the determination of an actual conflict of
interest. At the time, the vote was called & the decision published &
acted upon (so apparently there was no CoI determined).
I don't think it is constructive to revisit the details of a decision
the previous board took in 2020.
If you want to change the status quo, I suggest you pledge your case
to the current board, with arguments not attacking an old vote, but
why the actual change would be needed.
Description: PGP signature
Re: [board-discuss] Work On Update LOOL (was Re: LOOL is about to be archived) · Andreas Mantke
Re: [board-discuss] Work On Update LOOL (was Re: LOOL is about to be archived) · Michael Meeks
Re: [board-discuss] Work On Update LOOL (was Re: LOOL is about to be archived) · Paolo Vecchi
[board-discuss] Re: LOOL is about to be archived · Franklin Weng
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy