Hi Sophie and all,
On 25/06/2022 01:44, sophi wrote:
Hi Andreas, all
Le 25/06/2022 à 00:05, Andreas Mantke a écrit :
FYI: I wrote a short blog post about my work. And for those who like
visuals, I added two ones.
Thanks a lot for your work on this, I really appreciate and welcome
the efforts :) Maybe what we should do is to have an online meeting
between you, Franklin, Daniel, Paolo and of course who in the
community is interested to follow-up.
I'm very much in favour of it.
It is also important that you express your opinion during the board
Coincidentally LOOL was put in Monday's agenda just to confirm its
"disposal" so come to tell us what you think about it.
The new online version is a really good news for me (thanks a lot
Franklin and Andreas for that), and I guess for a large part of the
non European community (as well as for students, SMEs and so on).
There is a clear interest in the community to have this online version.
There is still no "new online version", there are a couple of proposals
on the table but it's up to all of us to make it happen.
This is for me rejoining part of the Foundation roots.
We might need a meeting dedicated to re-discovering the Foundation roots
as I have the impression that some have different understanding of why
TDF was created and what its role should be.
But we also have to think about the ecosystem and the value they have
built upon this version and for us. I'm also concerned about this. We
should not ignore it.
I fully agree with you but as TDF has grown and got more complex it is
essential to set clear rules of engagement between TDF and the ecosystem.
I'm really happy that TDF come back in this dynamic, however I think a
serious discussion have to take place between the ecosystem and TDF,
not to stop TDF in acting like it was in the past, but to find a fair
place to live for everybody.
I'm sure this place exists if all parties are ready to make an effort
to reach a common goal.
You may have noticed some decisions that have been recently published,
and there are more to come, showing that lots of work is being put into
it so that we can ensure that there is a fair and predictable
environment for current and future members of the ecosystem.
It takes time for a bunch of stubborn guys to get to some agreements but
we are getting there. It would be great if we could have more diverse
future boards to bring in different approaches to problem solving ;-)
I ask, if I may, everybody taking part to the discussion to have a
deep thought to the international community we, at TDF, are committed
True and it would be great to have more feedback from other parts of the
Hopefully once Decidim is up and running we'll have an easier way to
collect feedback and ideas from the various community so that it will be
easier to help each others.
Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Re: [board-discuss] Work On Update LOOL (was Re: LOOL is about to be archived) · Paolo Vecchi
[board-discuss] Re: LOOL is about to be archived · Franklin Weng
- Re: [board-discuss] Work On Update LOOL (was Re: LOOL is about to be archived) (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy