Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2022 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Sophie and all,

On 25/06/2022 01:44, sophi wrote:
Hi Andreas, all
Le 25/06/2022 à 00:05, Andreas Mantke a écrit :
Hi all,

FYI: I wrote a short blog post about my work. And for those who like
visuals, I added two ones.

Thanks a lot for your work on this, I really appreciate and welcome the efforts :) Maybe what we should do is to have an online meeting between you, Franklin, Daniel, Paolo and of course who in the community is interested to follow-up.

I'm very much in favour of it.

It is also important that you express your opinion during the board meetings.

Coincidentally LOOL was put in Monday's agenda just to confirm its "disposal" so come to tell us what you think about it.

The new online version is a really good news for me (thanks a lot Franklin and Andreas for that), and I guess for a large part of the non European community (as well as for students, SMEs and so on). There is a clear interest in the community to have this online version.

There is still no "new online version", there are a couple of proposals on the table but it's up to all of us to make it happen.

This is for me rejoining part of the Foundation roots.

We might need a meeting dedicated to re-discovering the Foundation roots as I have the impression that some have different understanding of why TDF was created and what its role should be.

But we also have to think about the ecosystem and the value they have built upon this version and for us. I'm also concerned about this. We should not ignore it.

I fully agree with you but as TDF has grown and got more complex it is essential to set clear rules of engagement between TDF and the ecosystem.

I'm really happy that TDF come back in this dynamic, however I think a serious discussion have to take place between the ecosystem and TDF, not to stop TDF in acting like it was in the past, but to find a fair place to live for everybody. I'm sure this place exists if all parties are ready to make an effort to reach a common goal.

You may have noticed some decisions that have been recently published, and there are more to come, showing that lots of work is being put into it so that we can ensure that there is a fair and predictable environment for current and future members of the ecosystem.

It takes time for a bunch of stubborn guys to get to some agreements but we are getting there. It would be great if we could have more diverse future boards to bring in different approaches to problem solving ;-)

I ask, if I may, everybody taking part to the discussion to have a deep thought to the international community we, at TDF, are committed to represent.

True and it would be great to have more feedback from other parts of the world.

Hopefully once Decidim is up and running we'll have an easier way to collect feedback and ideas from the various community so that it will be easier to help each others.




Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details:

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
Privacy Policy:


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.